Talk:Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL

Archives: 1: 30 days

Microbiology High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microbiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Microbiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicrobiologyWikipedia:WikiProject MicrobiologyTemplate:WikiProject MicrobiologyMicrobiology articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medicine Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mlan321, Mbutke15, Ilykdogs.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 00:56, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 24 August 2020 and 7 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Brodyq4.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 00:56, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Bm910713.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 03:58, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

MRSA phage therapy

I suggest a new topic.Phage therapy for MRSA Phage is an extremely good way to combat MRSA as shown by the fact that, until 1991, MRSA had was low(0.2%) in Denmark.Se https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2016506/ This was attributed to the phage-type complex 83A. Phage therapy for MRSA is the subject of a patent in 2001 https://patents.google.com/patent/US20040146490A1/en although the Danish observation from 1991 is not mentioned.Spgough (talk) Spgough (talk) 16:29, 19 March 2023 (UTC)Spgough (talk)[reply]

Carriage vs infection

This article is visited a lot, but it has a rather weak entry. The section "signs and symptoms" first rightly describe Staphylococcus aureus as a commensal bacteria, permanently colonising a considerable proportion of humans. Then, it goes on to describe skin infections? There are no "signs or symptoms" to separate MRSA from other bacterial infections, the reader who finds this site should not be mislead to think "MRSA" is a disease.

The section "Risk factors" also suffer under the same lack of understanding, in my opinion. Risk factors of what? Carriage? Carriage of S. aureus or carriage of MRSA? Infections? Infections of MRSA or infections of any Gram-positive cocci? The (now slightly outdated) list of references are just more or less random articles where random groups are found statistically significant for either of the conditions I mention above. There are hundreds, if not thousands of other articles like that. The list could be endless with narrowly defined groups "at risk" for MRSA-infection-or-carriage. Wikipedia should instead focus on the concept. What is "risk" when it comes to MRSA? Why are some humans carrying S. aureus and some not, why are some of those resistant and some not, why to some of those bacteria end up invading the tissues and causing an infection?

A minor comment is that the "research" section randomly lists some different research projects. Why are those chosen and not the thousands of others? Research into novel treatments targeting resistant infections should be listed in more general articles, and not specifically in the MRSA article. The treatment against MRSA is already well known, it's choosing a different active antibiotic...

I'm new to Wikipedia and wouldn't know where to start fixing this, but with some guidance I could contribute. Epianders (talk) 07:56, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]