Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blame it on blondie
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 06:43, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Band vanity. By their own admittance, have released 1 demo and are working on an EP. Dunc|☺ 16:16, 14 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep. Written by User:Justinarama, does not appear to be vanity. Verifiable and NPOV. DoubleBlue (Talk) 16:34, 14 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not terribly notable. Article is also currently an orphan. EvilPhoenix
- Nope. (that is, delete) Way under WP:MUSIC, even for a "small-genre" band (they're a Christian band). I've got no problem considering bands notable enough in context, but 1 self-released demo CD plus shows only in northern Alabama equals non-notable vanity (even if written by a fan and not a band member). Soundguy99 20:23, 14 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- WP:MUSIC is not policy. WP:V is. DoubleBlue (Talk) 04:25, 15 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I was inclined to vote "keep", until I discovered the article was just band vanity, instead of a Penny Singleton film. Edeans 21:21, 14 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, not notable. ✏ OvenFresh² 22:00, 14 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, not notable. Megan1967 03:46, 15 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. →Iñgōlemo← talk 03:33, 2005 May 19 (UTC)
- Delete --130.232.129.242 09:58, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.