Talk:Herbert Wechsler
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]Please delete the original as a copyright violation and replace with the temporary stub that has been created.
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Herbert Wechsler. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071109175918/http://www.ali.org/ali/R2204_Wechsler.htm to http://www.ali.org/ali/R2204_Wechsler.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:29, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
Removed comment
[edit]The article contained this comment, which belongs on the talk page and not in the body:
"THE SENTENCE I DELETED FROM THIS PARAGRAPH IS INCORRECT - WECHSLER DID NOT ARGUE THE KOREMATSU CASE IN THE SUPREME COURT OR IN ANY OTHER COURT. THE U.S. GOVERNMENT WAS REPRESENTED AT THE SUPREME COURT ARGUMENT BY CHARLES FAHY, THE U.S. SOLICITOR GENERAL AT THE TIME. SEE https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/323/214.html. THE REMAINING SENTENCE INTHIS PARAGRAPH CORRECTLY NOTES THAT WECHSLER WAS IN CHARGE OF THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT'S WAR DIVISION - THE WAR DIVISION'S RESPONSIBILITIES DID NOT INCLUDE ARGUING CASES IN COURT. BY CONTRAST, IT WAS (AND STILL IS) THE SOLICITOR GENERAL'S JOB TO ARGUE SUPREME COURT CASES. WECHSLER'S NAME MAY HAVE APPEARED ON THE BRIEF AS ONE OF THE DOJ ATTORNEYS WHO PARTICIPATED IN ITS PREPARATION, BUT HE DID NOT ARGUE THE CASE. FURTHERMORE, I WAS IN A CLASS AT COLUMBIA LAW SCHOOL TAUGHT BY WECHSLER IN 1980 OR 1981 IN WHICH WECHSLER DESCRIBED THE INTERNAL DISCUSSIONS THAT LED TO ROOSEVELT'S DECISION TO INTERN JAPANESE-AMERICANS, AND HE WAS QUITE CLEAR THAT HE HAD OPPOSED THE DECISION."
I have moved it here for posterity.-Ich (talk) 20:21, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
- Start-Class law articles
- Unknown-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- Start-Class biography articles
- Start-Class biography (science and academia) articles
- Low-importance biography (science and academia) articles
- Science and academia work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Start-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Start-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject United States articles