User:R. S. Shaw/z

areas that could use some work

art on n-address or n-operand instr formats? - see what's around
Martha Carrier
Significance arithmetic
Flight management system -no art; research needed
trap
instruction
Computer Architecture mentions CPU architecture which redirs to CPU design. Also, Processor Arch redirs to CPU design. Then there's instruction set which talks about the larger ISA. A mess of substandard articles, twisty passages all alike.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X86_assembly_language

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memory_Model

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Macro_Assembler

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/32-bit_application

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flat_memory_model

http://webster.cs.ucr.edu/Page_TechDocs/MASMDoc/ProgrammersGuide/Chap_02.htm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memory_segment

test -R. S. Shaw 03:47, 13 June 2006 (UTC) - 13 June 2006

edits [1] [2] [3] prose

Citations

Wikipedia:Citing sources - style guide
Wikipedia:Citing sources/example style
Wikipedia:Template messages/Sources of articles/Citation quick reference
Wikipedia:Template messages/Sources of articles/Generic citations
Wikipedia:Template messages/Sources of articles
Wikipedia:Footnotes - this has the highlighted simple < ref > example
Wikipedia:Inline citation
Wikipedia:Harvard referencing
Wikipedia:WikiProject Fact and Reference Check - some related info
Wikipedia talk:Footnotes/Mixed citations and footnotes - talk pg only - example
User:Spangineer/inline citations - maybe some guy's draft proposal
m:Cite/Cite.php
Category:Citation templates
Wikipedia:Footnote2

Inconsistent use of "reviewed" and "quality" (Jan 2009)

On the "Page stabilization" page (Special:Stabilization), the text says "The latest quality revision; if not present, then the latest sighted one" on one line, and on the next line says " The latest reviewed revision". If my understanding is right, reviewed revision and quality revision mean the same thing. Only one of the synonymous terms should be used in order to avoid confusion. -R. S. Shaw (talk) 22:37, 24 January 2009 (UTC)