Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Friederich Golz
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 04:44, 27 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
37 Googles says he's non-notable, unless of course there's some special scientist criteria guideline I don't know of. Master Thief Garrett 08:02, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Notable and verifiable, seems to have done pioneering work in surgery. Martg76 08:28, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep — first doctor to perform animal experiments in lobotomy makes him notable. But there isn't a lot of other information available, so perhaps he should just be summarized on the lobotomy page? — RJH 16:31, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Or if not, merge and redirect to Psychosurgery (which is where Lobotomy points). Google counting is probably not much use for this kind of thing. You need to know the significance of what you're reading about. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 17:43, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, and expand. Notable. Megan1967 06:48, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.