Talk:Nuclear utilization target selection

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force

Cold War Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cold War, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Cold War on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Cold WarWikipedia:WikiProject Cold WarTemplate:WikiProject Cold WarCold War articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

why is it

why is it, that those nuclear-holocaust-programs all have such strange acronyms ?? NUTS (=crazy) MAD (=crazy) ??? gallows humour anyone ?-- ExpImp^talkcon 23:35, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Probably true. I guess the idea for this strategy was born in some politicans head, and when he told the gernerals to work it out they just told each other that this was totally nuts cause it couldnt work. And now they just had to find words for the letters ... and come on ":Nuclear utilization target selection" doesnt make much sense- but NUTS describes it pretty well —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.178.182.94 (talk) 20:51, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My 2 cents: it could also be a reference to Colonel Joseph H. Harper; when asked to surrender to the Wehrmacht during the battle of Bastogne his response letter to the Germans said simply "Nuts!". Could make sense. 70.81.89.66 (talk) 05:45, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

From the wiki page on Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD): "The strategy of Mutually Assured Destruction and the acronym MAD are due to John von Neumann (1903–1957)[11] and his taste for humorous acronyms, another example being his MANIAC computer."94.175.244.252 (talk) 08:07, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not a hoax

I've removed the hoax template from this article as I was able to find many google books and google scholar sources for it. I've added one as a reference. ascidian | talk-to-me 10:41, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nuclear utilization target selection. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080708193823/http://missilethreat.com/missilesoftheworld/ to http://www.missilethreat.com/missilesoftheworld/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:52, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]