Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rijndael encryption alogrithm

Article Rijndael encryption alogrithm listed on WP:VFD July 4 to July 12 2004, consensus was to delete. Discussion:

• Keep. Redirects that you think should be deleted should go on redirects for deletion, misspellings are usually kept in case someone outside of Wikipedia links to them. Dunc_Harris|☺ 13:38, 4 Jul 2004 (UTC)

This is weird. I don't think Wikipedia should "support" misspellings just because someone out there maybe uses misspelled links... Just my two cents, though. --Alexandre 08:42, 5 Jul 2004 (UTC)

• Keep, perfectly reasonable redirect. -- Cyrius|✎ 20:39, 4 Jul 2004 (UTC)
• Comment: I'd be inclined to delete this one, if it's needed replace it by one from alogrithm. A redirect from Rijndael encryption algorithm already exists. But as has been said, this isn't the place to raise this anyway. Andrewa 21:40, 4 Jul 2004 (UTC)
• delete, it's just a typo! Erich 06:27, 8 Jul 2004 (UTC)
• delete of course. the idea that random typos should be permanently kept is one of the silliest around. only common mispellings should be kept as redirects. --Zero 09:26, 9 Jul 2004 (UTC)