Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chauncey L. Covington
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. – ABCD 02:40, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
7 Google hits including forum posts he apparently wrote himself. Non-notable. Not a signed musician/producer. Possible hoax or vanity. --BM 23:22, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Hopeless vanity. Delete. JFW | T@lk 23:31, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. The published essays alluded to are on his blog. They're
eloquentlywritten, if nothing else. Miles (Talk) 23:42, Apr 6, 2005 (UTC) - Delete --AYArktos 01:03, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- note also his changes to Dichotomy where he refers to himself as a foremost thinker, several other changes made from this IP have been reverted
- Delete - vanity--Clngre 01:38, Apr 7, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete In a brainslug voice: "I concur!" Looks like a Discordian prank. 195.148.74.159 06:39, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, not notable, vanity. Megan1967 06:48, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Delete not notable Dsmdgold 22:53, Apr 7, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete as vanity. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 21:28, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Wikipedia isn't a soapbox or an advertising space. Mgm|(talk) 22:49, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, vanity. See also Wikipedian Elitism. RickK 23:15, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, vanity. --Wgfinley 19:52, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Delete (although I like the drawing). Rhobite 05:19, Apr 11, 2005 (UTC)
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.