Jump to content

Talk:James Heckman

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"Economic Sciences"

[edit]

There is no such thing. It should be removed. He's a sociologist with an interest in economics. "Economic Science" does not exist.

Remove selection bias

[edit]

Isn't this article about James Heckman? How about removing this part:


The literature has always been complex, but the main idea is fairly simple. Economists routinely take data on wages to calculate average wages. Many subjects are unemployed, and thus would have missing wages. Before Heckman, economists would simply discard all records with missing wages and then calculate averages using the remaining observations. Heckman shows that this process can lead to selection bias because observations do not have missing wages at random. For instance, poorer individuals of one group may be unemployed more often, so average wages may be too high for this group. Thus, Heckman's work has persuaded economists to treat missing observations more carefully. He has also pioneered the application of economics to econometrics and has conducted numerous empirical studies.


As it's just a simplified rewrite of this article. I would remove it directly, but since I'm really new I would like some advice first. :) —HaZe

My understanding is that Heckman won his Nobel for work on social programs. The whole old dogs/young dogs thing.

professorship at Dublin

[edit]

That he accepts a professorship at Dublin, doesn't mean he move out from Chicago, does he?--B.F.Pinkerton 21:24, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image

[edit]

File:Heckman2.jpg This is another photo, for when this article grows up and there will be space for more pictures AdamSmithee 08:12, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on James Heckman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:39, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

His research on IQ is highly debated

[edit]

Quite simply his research failed replication, see Zisman & Ganzach 2022. I believe its very important to change this part since he is a Nobel Laureate and hence considered an authority, in economic not psychology. 2A02:AA1:102D:DBC8:918E:F17A:8D51:190C (talk) 13:45, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]