Talk:Perfect mirror

Physics Mid‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Technology Start‑class

	Technology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Is this a theoretical concept or do they exist? Evercat 20:25, 6 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Citations

Would be good to add some primary citation instead of just a PR item. Here are the articles I find by the researchers mentioned in the press release:

Urbas, A., Fink, Y., Thomas, E. L., “One Dimensionally Periodic Dielectric Reflectors from self Assembled Block Copolymer-Homopolymer Blends”, Macromolecules, 32, 14, 4748-4750 (1999).
Fink, Y., Winn J. N., Fan, S., Michel, J., Chen, C., Joannopoulos, J. D., Thomas, E. L., “A Dielectric Omnidirectional Reflector” Science 282, 1679-1682, (1998).
Winn J. N., Fink, Y., Fan, S., Joannopoulos, J. D., “Omnidirectional Reflection from a One-Dimensional Photonic Crystal”, Optics Letters, 23, 20, 1573-1575, (1998).

Could someone with access to these articles figure out which (if any) actually report on an actual perfect mirror? Or else adjust the article to indicate exactly how "perfect" these actually are? Maybe check Citation Index to see what's been done since then? DMacks 19:25, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why

Why would anyone want a perfect mirror? Is it good for anything? Does it have any practical or theoretical uses?

There are many reasons someone might want to reflect all their light instead of losing some to mirrors. A different one for every situation, in fact. Nothing worse than finding out that you lose too much energy in your experiment to see whatever you're looking for: either have to buy a bigger laser or try to cut down on the number of lossy optics. — Laura Scudder ☎ 22:43, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

They can be used with surgical lasers to access previously unreachable brain tumors. I'm also not sure why they couldn't also be used as part of efforts for full invisibility. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.24.278.98 (talk) 01:20, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fiber optics

Do fiber optics count as a sort of "perfect mirror"? – Kerαunoςcopia^◁_galaxies 10:18, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Very complex mirrors

"A very complex dielectric mirror can reflect up to 99.999% of the light incident upon it..." Is the point that the mirror is complex? Or is it rather that is is high-quality, carefully constructed, or something? 84.227.237.33 (talk) 14:23, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Perfect mirror. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/1998/mirror.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:45, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]