User talk:Josquius

I've had it with wikipedia editing.

Though wikipedia remains useful for some things the way the community has mutated over the years has not been for the better. The mob rule mentality of the place which allows special interest groups to dictate their version of the truth in their special interest topics is not good at all. I can only hope that the public at large realises to treat everything they read on wikipedia with a large pinch of salt.

Please do not leave any comments on this talk page as I've sadly been pushed beyond caring for the contributions I have made in the past.

Nonetheless I do occasionally feel the need to edit minor errors I find- however the way certain people given a modicum of power, let it go to their head, and instantly revert anything made by an IP address as obviouisly bad makes this less than worthwhile.

Proposed deletion of Operation Tyr

The article Operation Tyr has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Confimred hoax, see [1]; doesn't even look like a notable hoax after doing some primary searching for this.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –MuZemike 20:53, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of the article Sea of Claws

I'm hereby notifying you that the article Sea of Claws has been proposed for deletion. Thanks. Flamarande (talk) 01:37, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Finnish Wikipedia

The article Finnish Wikipedia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable website, per WP:NOTABLE, composed of first-hand sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 22:43, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Ghost Frequency

The article The Ghost Frequency has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NBAND

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Giant Snowman 20:39, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox Uppsala nations

Template:Infobox Uppsala nations has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Alakzi (talk) 00:16, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kubichek! for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kubichek! is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kubichek! until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Scr★pIron^IV 20:11, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:X201/Console wars

User:X201/Console wars, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:X201/Console wars and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:X201/Console wars during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 20:52, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indian independance listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Indian independance. Since you had some involvement with the Indian independance redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 22:00, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Estalia

The article Estalia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 21:20, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Greater Britain listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Greater Britain. Since you had some involvement with the Greater Britain redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --Nevé –selbert 10:32, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nochex for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nochex is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nochex (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Newslinger talk 23:49, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nochex

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nochex, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. — Newslinger talk 23:53, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your article Kalmar nation, Uppsala

Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page Kalmar nation, Uppsala to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. PoliceSheep99 (talk) 00:03, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your article Kalmar nation, Uppsala

Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page Kalmar nation, Uppsala to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. PoliceSheep99 (talk) 00:04, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Devil's grandmother

The article Devil's grandmother has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PoliceSheep99 (talk) 00:08, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Costa del Crime listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Costa del Crime. Since you had some involvement with the Costa del Crime redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. PoliceSheep99 (talk) 00:09, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Italian North Africa for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Italian North Africa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Italian North Africa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. UnitedStatesian (talk) 17:06, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Grey Baskerville has left the building

After surviving AfDs, Doug Thorley and Magoo are still up, but both could use better sourcing. I'm wondering if you've got back issues of Hot Rod, Car Craft, National Dragster, & the like that would help. Ditto on Jake, Showboat, The Mantaray, Ed Donovan, Donovan hemi, Silhouette, and a few others I've created lately. (Have a look at my userpage under the "Open Vanity" 3&4.) Any help you can be would be very much appreciated.

Don't give up: fight back! TREKphiler ^{any time you're ready, Uhura} 06:18, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Journal of Oregon Ornithology

The article Journal of Oregon Ornithology has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable journal. No independent sources, not indexed anywhere. Homepage was last updated 10 years ago, so likely moribund. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NJournals.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 07:04, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Journal of Oregon Ornithology for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Journal of Oregon Ornithology is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Journal of Oregon Ornithology until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Randykitty (talk) 16:30, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Genestealer for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Genestealer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Genestealer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 10:51, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Squat (Warhammer 40,000) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Squat (Warhammer 40,000) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Squat (Warhammer 40,000) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ―Susmuffin ^Talk 20:10, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hard fantasy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hard fantasy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hard fantasy (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 12:24, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Football(soccer)" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Football(soccer). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 15#Football(soccer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. TheAwesome Hwyh 20:49, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Horus Heresy (fictional event) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Horus Heresy (fictional event) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Horus Heresy (fictional event) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jontesta (talk) 01:43, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Football(soccer)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Football(soccer) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 6#Football(soccer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 19:22, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]