Talk:ICC Men's Cricket World Cup Qualifier

Cricket Low‑importance

This article is part of WikiProject Cricket which aims to expand and organise information better in articles related to the sport of cricket. Please participate by visiting the project and talk pages for more details.CricketWikipedia:WikiProject CricketTemplate:WikiProject Cricketcricket articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Cricket To-do list:

Article assessment

Check Category:Unassessed cricket articles for class and Category:Unknown-importance cricket articles for importance: see Assessment Department for details

Verifiability

Update fair and unfair play, fast bowling, first-class cricket, googly, innings, leg break, limited overs cricket, not out, Pakistan Cricket Board, spin bowling, underarm bowling, wicket, and other fundamental articles classified by the WikiProject as high-importance so that they meet WP:Verifiability policy standards

Cleanup

There is a toolserver based WikiProject Cricket cleanup list that automatically updates weekly to show all articles covered by this project which are marked with cleanup tags. (also available in one big list and in CSV format)

Infoboxes

Add infoboxes to the player articles found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/requested infoboxes

Cricket people

Create articles about 19th century players who are listed in Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/19th century players
Create biographies about Bangladeshi players from the task force redlink list
Check the listing of key bios at Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/Key biographies and improve these to at least B-class.
Create batting/bowling graphs for cricketers who have excelled in international cricket.
Create articles for redlinks present here and here

Cricket teams & countries

Domestic cricket coverage is needed for Bangladesh, Canada, Kenya, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe;
Create articles from redlinks and improve existing articles in List of current first-class cricket teams; National cricket teams; Under-19 national cricket teams
Create articles about cricket in these missing countries
Create or expand articles on international tours from items in Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/summary of international tour articles
Create a link as such on Template:Cr-Aus/doc for Cricket Australia XI

Images

Add pictures (and remove template from address requests) in these Category:Wikipedia requested images of cricket people
Add pictures for grounds missing photos from here

On this day in cricket

Expand the anniversary coverage for Portal:Cricket at Portal:Cricket/Anniversaries

Umpires

Expand ICC International umpire panel; ICC Elite referee panel; ICC Associates and Affiliates umpire panel

Women

Expand Women's cricket, Women's Test cricket and articles about women's cricket generally especially biographies and tours

Update

A number of lists need to be updated, can be found in Template:International cricketers and Template:National cricket captains
Regularly updating cricketers' career stats.

Other

Export all cricket terms present in List of cricket terms to Wiktionary

The link to the "bowling records" page in the appropriate section of the ICC's website is broken (like many other links on the site, actually), hence their lack of inclusion here until an alternative source of data can be found. Loganberry 23:37, 28 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

CricketArchive has solved this particular problem. [1] Loganberry (Talk) 1 July 2005 23:08 (UTC)

Kenya

This from Cricinfo [2]:

Now the lure is the four-year investment from the ICC and one-day status, on top of the World Cup place. Five places are up for grabs in Ireland - the sixth slot is already guaranteed to Kenya as part of the sweetener for them losing their one-day membership - and those six will get all the benefits until the 2009 ICC Trophy when they will all have to qualify again.

Loganberry (Talk) 30 June 2005 03:31 (UTC)

That's cricinfo...the name is changed now...look here--Thugchildz 16:14, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 9 February 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Consensus to not move. COMMONNAME dispute to be continued in separate move request. (non-admin closure) SocietyBox (talk) 20:55, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

– Consistency throughout all topics related to the "ICC (Men's) Cricket World Cup", whose common name is "Cricket World Cup". SocietyBox (talk) 22:21, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Looking at the press releases from the ICC, along with other cricket websites, it seems the common name for these tournaments contains the ICC acronym throughout. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 18:36, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- @Lugnuts: Please explain why your argument doesn't apply for Cricket World Cup as you opposed the move proposal for that in this discussion. SocietyBox (talk) 19:47, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That page isn't being moved. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 19:49, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Lugnuts: Not my point. I just want to know if you oppose consistency or would you agree to changing "Cricket World Cup" to "ICC Cricket World Cup" (different from the July 2020 request which had "Men's") across the board. SocietyBox (talk) 19:55, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Short answer(s): No and yes. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 19:59, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

When this request gets shut down I'll be proposing that move on your behalf. I can see you'd rather not propose that yourself and have your opinions come under fire. SocietyBox (talk) 20:04, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose not the WP:COMMONNAME. Someone feel free to nominate the 50 over World Cup article if you want, as renaming that is the easiest way to achieve consistency. Joseph2302 (talk) 20:29, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.