Talk:Serafino Dubois

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Chess Low‑importance

	Chess portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chess, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Chess on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChessWikipedia:WikiProject ChessTemplate:WikiProject Chesschess articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

old talk

This article is marked as POV and cleanup, but I can't really see any grave issues with neither, particularly with the neutrality. Of couse, most articles can allways be improved uppon, but that doesn't automatically make them candidates for cleanup. This one is on par. I propose to remove the tags in a couple of weeks if no one objects. -Frodet 17:33, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Second the motion. I'll go ahead and do that now. Kerowyn 06:42, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Chessmetrics and WP:UNDUE

Chessmetrics has many shortcomings, particularly for 19th century players. Sometimes players drop off the list for several years at a time then come back, in the mean time a lesser player has taken over the number one ranking spot. Does anybody seriously believe Berthold Suhle was the world #1 player between 1865 and 1867? Another, perhaps more accurate historical rating system can be found at edochess.ca; they rate Dubois #5 at his peak, which sounds more realistic to me than #1. MaxBrowne (talk) 02:35, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Chessmetrics has no rated games for Dubois during the 2.5-year period when it has him ranked #1. And even Edochess ratings and rankings have to be taken with a huge grain of salt: Dubois was ranked #7 at the end of 1860 and #5 at the end of 1861, even though neither he nor the two people he passed on the rating list (Petrov and Harrwitz) played a single game that year. Misuse of these historical rating websites is a frequent problem with our chess biographies. Cobblet (talk) 09:06, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]