Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Army-navy stores

This page is an archive of the discussion surrounding the proposed deletion of the page entitled Army-navy stores.

This page is kept as an historic record.

The result of the debate was to keep the article.

---

Dicdef. Maybe a topic worth an article; is there any reason to keep this as a stub? -- Jmabel 06:37, 31 May 2004 (UTC)

• Keep (I think). I can imagine there being e.g. historical information about the origin/spread of the stores that could go here. Markalexander100 06:41, 31 May 2004 (UTC)
• I'd say keep. I've made it into a slightly better stub, and this is an encyclopedic topic. Meelar 06:43, 31 May 2004 (UTC)
• Like the new stub. Keep - TB 10:04, 2004 May 31 (UTC)
• Keep - dtto The Land 20:25, 31 May 2004 (UTC)
• Keep. Don't much like the new stub, sorry, Meelar but it's a start on potentially a good topic. I remember when Army-Navy stores really did carry war surplus. I have no idea what happens to "war surplus" these days, but it doesn't get into the Army-Navy stores any more. Or Edmund Scientific (ah, I remember the great days when it had only just changed its name from Edmund Salvage, and you could buy chipped lenses from them in coin envelopes...) Dpbsmith 00:31, 1 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  • Hey, I wasn't shooting for a medal--I've visited one army surplus store once in my life (about 10 years ago), and have never heard anything more of the concept. No offense taken. Meelar 05:15, 1 Jun 2004 (UTC)
• Keep. Yellow pages search indicates at least 30 companies called 'Army and Navy store' in the UK.
• keep Exploding Boy 09:01, Jun 1, 2004 (UTC)

---

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue or the deletion should be placed on other relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.

---