Talk:The Way of the Tiger
The Way of the Tiger was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was KEEP
The co-authors of this rather obscure series of books are already on VFD (here and here), so this might as well get nominated for good measure. --DMG413 01:41, 7 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Not notable, and very little information given. Delete. --Slowking Man 06:47, Oct 7, 2004 (UTC)
- Merge and Keep. In the UK, these were pretty well known books, in their time. Maybe not anymore, mind. I remember reading them as a wee bairn. Anyway, combined with the authors' bios, theres probably one reasonable article to be dragged out of these. -- GWO 17:57, 7 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. Any series of books is going to be notable to someone.--Tomheaton 19:16, 8 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete: Over and over again, we run across series of books that aren't significant. In this case, this is a genre that eats its dead. Had these books set the ground, set the trend, made the rest possible, etc., then they would have been generically important and notable. Geogre 13:11, 9 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. A book is a book is a book. An encyclopaedia should chart their rise and fall - having fallen is not justification for exclusion, else we'd exclude a hell of a lot... 80.255 00:58, 11 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. A reasonably popular series of books in their time (in the UK at least) which also gave rise to a well-regarded computer game. -- ChrisO 17:46, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC)
End archived discussion -- Graham ☺ | Talk 00:37, 14 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Start a discussion about improving the The Way of the Tiger page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "The Way of the Tiger" page.
