Talk:Amarula

Spirits Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spirits, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spirits or Distilled beverages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpiritsWikipedia:WikiProject SpiritsTemplate:WikiProject SpiritsSpirits articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Spirits WikiProject task list:

This list is transcluded from the tasks page, to edit it click here.

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Spirits:

Tagging all articles that fall under our scope with {{WikiProject Spirits}} and assessing their quality and importance to the project.

South Africa Mid‑importance

	South Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of South Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject South AfricaTemplate:WikiProject South AfricaSouth Africa articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Peeps, with reference to the above comments, and having poured myself a small measure, I've updated the article to specify (among opther things) the current license holder. To my mind, the product of a private company can be the topic of a neutral POV article; provided that the product be identified as such -- a commercial PRODUCT, not a traditional recipe (like haggis) or a semi-natural strain, like basmati rice. There's nothing wrong with being straightforward about the economic context to this item -- quite the contrary, it should be known to be sold for a profit (hence, that the producer has an interest in it). If anyone has further info on the blandly named Southern Liqueur Company of (presumably) South Africa, perhaps another company stub is in order.

Pufferfyshe (talk) 23:17, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Amarula. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090217010756/http://www.fin24.com/articles/default/display_article.aspx?Nav=ns&ArticleID=1518-1786_2093928 to http://www.fin24.com/articles/default/display_article.aspx?Nav=ns&ArticleID=1518-1786_2093928

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:06, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File nominated for deletion on commons

The file c:File:Amarula (1563541954).jpg has been nominated for deletion on Commons 
Reason: Derivative works, c:COM:PACKAGING, above c:COM:TOO. 
Deletion request: link

Message automatically deposited by a robot - -Harideepan (talk) 07:28, 3 March 2018 (UTC).[reply]

Citation

Will this do for a citation on the elephant/marula relationship? https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/02/070215140224.htm

advertisement

External links modified

File nominated for deletion on commons

Citation