Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Berkeley Carroll School
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - kept - SimonP 01:39, May 22, 2005 (UTC)
Private school of 800 students. Demonstrate notability or delete. Neutralitytalk 23:20, May 16, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep, notable. Kappa 23:40, 16 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep schools. Inherently notable. R Calvete 01:40, 2005 May 17 (UTC)
- Keep --Howrealisreal 02:47, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Lupin 02:49, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Seems like a good stub to me. It's an independent, nonsectarian, coed day school, you know. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 03:33, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Useless collection of generic facts about an insignificant school. This is not an encyclopedia article. Individual schools are not inherently encyclopedic and there is nothing to distinguish insignificant schools like this one from thousands of nearly identical schools around the world. Gamaliel 03:38, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, verifiable - SimonP 04:01, May 17, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Non-notable. Quale 04:04, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Decent stub. DS1953 04:12, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep schools. Verifiable and NPOV. First, preserve knowledge, then expand knowledge. --Unfocused 04:54, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep for the usual reasons. Kelly Martin 05:13, May 17, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Instutional Vanity, wikipedia is not triviapedia.Gmaxwell 06:14, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge into Park Slope, Brooklyn and delete - Skysmith 09:52, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge into (applicable location) and Delete Master Thief Garrett 11:24, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep.JuntungWu 12:38, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- keep Lotsofissues 14:05, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, nn. Radiant_* 14:35, May 17, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete I can verify a lot of things that still aren't notable. Like how much change is in my pocket right now, for instance. --InShaneee 14:40, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Wouldn't change in your pocket be notable if you ever wanted to buy something later? Don't give up on school articles please, there is potential for a lot of important information to fill these pages. --Howrealisreal 15:46, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- No you can't. Reread Wikipedia:Verifiability for what the word means here - David Gerard 22:43, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Notability is still not a listed deletion criterion - David Gerard 22:43, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep All schools are notable by nature. Verifiable and NPOV. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, ergo it is encyclopaedic. User:GRider/Schoolwatch Klonimus 13:24, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. (1)We don't even have a policy about schools yet, (2)schools are important and should be included, (3)this massive deletion campaign is terrible. Introduce a limit of 3 vfd nominations per day. --Zantastik 22:32, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.