Talk:Dive tables

Text and/or other creative content from Dive tables was copied or moved into Decompression (diving) with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Square profile

the "square dive" profile which dive tables are designed for is a commonly used term (see e.g. [1], [2], [3]), although "rectangular" would of course be a better expression. regards, High on a tree 20:30, 30 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

OK ;) Mark Richards 21:48, 1 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. ukexpat (talk) 03:37, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dive table → Dive tables — Requesting the page be moved back to its stable title (moved by user Kjkolb (talk · contribs) to this title earlier today). The reason given for the change was "no reason for plural form as per Wikipedia naming conventions", but WP:SINGULAR specifically makes the exception for articles which are "the names of classes of objects". The overwhelming use is dive tables in the plural, particularly as any named set of tables (e.g. US Navy tables, Bühlmann tables) will consist of several discrete tables. —RexxS (talk) 22:16, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

For examples of where the word 'tables' is used to refer to collections of sets of tabular data, see Rudolphine Tables, Alfonsine tables, Iguvine Tables, Alternative periodic tables, League tables of British universities, Thomson Financial League Tables, Generating trigonometric tables, etc. --RexxS (talk) 00:38, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. Singular is almost always preferable. — the Man in Question (in question) 23:47, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. Since the start of research into repetitive diving, no printed guidelines have involved the use of a single table. In fact, the guidelines printed prior to that were also generally split in several tables of information (one for each depth) similar to the format of the existing United States Navy decompression tables. --Gene Hobbs (talk) 01:19, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support The Common decompression tables section clearly notes how this is a class of tables.--Labattblueboy (talk) 14:51, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.