Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cathedral High School

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - kept - SimonP 02:38, May 23, 2005 (UTC)

Cathedral High School

Notability not established. Establish notability by the end of the five-day period or delete. Neutrality^talk 04:47, May 17, 2005 (UTC)

Delete unless wikipedia wants a boring, pointless article for every average school in every country. CDThieme
Keep. There you go with the ultimatum again. Give it a rest. The school website is brimming with good stuff that can be used to produce a good article. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 05:17, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, does not indicate notability. Gazpacho 05:27, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and expand with verifiable information. Notability should not be a requirement for high schools; it isn't for railway stations, why should these have a higher standard? --BaronLarf 05:29, May 17, 2005 (UTC)
Keep schools. Verifiable and NPOV. First, preserve knowledge, then expand knowledge. Thanks to Neutrality, I've had no time for adding content today. --Unfocused 05:35, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Kappa 06:01, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Instutional vanity Gmaxwell 06:03, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not notable, schools cruft. Megan1967 06:03, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep DS1953 06:06, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, "things that make you go '-cruft'!" Master Thief Garrett 07:30, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Springfield, Massachusetts and delete - Skysmith 09:24, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep.JuntungWu 12:42, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Subject should be verifiable. - SimonP 13:24, May 17, 2005 (UTC)
Keep. Encyclopedic, verifiable and NPOV. Meets all agreed-upon Wikipedia standards. Like some others, I will be copy-pasting this to all the high school votes since Neutrality seems to have mass-suggested articles for VfD simply because of a POV judgment of their subject--Cynical 13:46, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep schools in wikipedia. --Howrealisreal 14:54, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, vanity. R adiant _* 15:02, May 17, 2005 (UTC)
Delete Just because you can fill a page with verifiable info does NOT a notable page make. --InShaneee 15:02, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/Consolidate into article on area private schools. — RJH 15:44, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Longhair | Talk 17:00, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep schools. Inherently notable (expect to be seeing this posted quite a few times). R Calvete 19:40, 2005 May 17 (UTC)
Delete. Useless collection of generic facts about an insignificant school. This is not an encyclopedia article. Individual schools are not inherently encyclopedic and there is nothing to distinguish insignificant schools like this one from thousands of nearly identical schools around the world. Gamaliel 20:24, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the schoolcruft. Ketsuban has spoken. The debate is over. 21:05, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Notability is still not a listed deletion criterion - David Gerard 23:15, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non-notable. Quale 23:47, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Springfield, Massachusetts per my school article policy (or else replace with dab for all the other Cathedral High Schools that are necessarily out there). Kelly Martin 01:58, May 18, 2005 (UTC)
Keep and delist. This school is over 100+ years old. WP:POINT. —RaD Man (talk) 07:39, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Lots of articles start out as mere stubs. Let them grow; don't kill them. Visit Schoolwatch to vote on other schools up for vfd. --Zantastik 18:25, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep These tactics are outrageous. CalJW 18:40, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete = not notable. NoAccount 03:05, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Old enough to be notable. Jayjg ^(talk) 18:12, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Notable catholic school worthy of inclusion. User:GRider/Schoolwatch Klonimus 23:33, 22 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.