Jump to content

Talk:Leader of the House of Commons

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I have the following probable additions to the list (with sources):

but also

I should go to the library and try to find a proper source. --rbrwr

There can be some confusion as there are occassions when the PM formally took the position of Leader of the House, but the day to day duties were handled by someone else. If I recall correctly, Churchill was actually the formal leader for the period 1940-1942 (after a proposal to have Chamberlain was blocked by the Labour Party) but the day to day tasks were done by Attlee. Similarly in the 1924 Labour government MacDonald was formally leader, but most of the job was done by J.R. Clynes, who was formally Deputy Leader of the House. Timrollpickering 17:38, 18 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Perhaps we should indicate both the official leader and the de facto leader in such instances. john 20:00, 18 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Does anyone have any sense on who was leading the commons during the period between Pitt's resignation in April 1757 and the establishment of the Newcastle-Pitt ministry in July? Legge resigned, and what you've got left of senior ministers is Devonshire (Treasury), Holdernesse (Secretary of State), Granville (Lord President), Gower (Lord Privy Seal), Winchilsea (Admiralty)....all Lords. In terms of more junior posts, George Grenville was Treasurer of the Navy. Would it have been him? john k 03:37, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am concerned that there is no history of the office in the article - that was what I came looking for. You give a list of the holders of the office since 1721 - what's the office / role before then! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ender's Shadow Snr (talk • contribs) 00:18, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

The image File:Michael Foot.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --10:53, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Russell in 1834

[edit]

In what sense was Russell leader of the House in 1834? Earl Spencer died on November 10, elevating Althorp to the House of Lords. Melbourne then advised the king that Russell should become leader of the House. The King instead fired the ministry on November 14 and called for Wellington. It seems fairly clear that Russell was not, during the four days that interceded between Althorp's elevation and the ministry's fall, considered to be yet the leader of the House of Commons. Unless someone can explain why he should be so considered, I am going to remove him. john k (talk) 01:45, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

1990-92

[edit]

The article says it was John MacGregor, however Hansard says it was Nicholas Baker (politician), though Hansard doesn't give an end date (suggesting their information may be wrong). I don't know either way. I have emailed Hansard to ask them to check their own records. 93.96.236.8 (talk) 11:51, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Business Statement.

[edit]

Greetings Rrius. I made an amendment to this to provide an easier reference to the Business statement. I didn't intend to change the sense but your correction sounded a little fierce! In any event your edit makes the article is better than it was 2 days ago but I reinserted the reference. Regards JRPG (talk) 15:51, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What I said, that the Leader of the House doesn't establish the business by fiat, was not a response to you; it was an explanation of my noting the whips. On the other point about the reference, the link you provided has nothing to do with the text aside from the tenuous connection of having recent business statements linked. There is no discussion there of what the business statement is, so I am (once again) removing it. -Rrius (talk) 17:18, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Leader of the House of Commons. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:41, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

taking PMQs

[edit]

"When there is either no Deputy Prime Minister or First Secretary of State, or either the Deputy Prime Minister or First Secretary of State is unavailable, the Leader of the House may stand in for an absent Prime Minister at Prime Minister's Questions, although this procedure is relatively unusual." From 2007 to 2010, Harriet Harman took questions at PMQs in Brown's absence. She did it for a 3-year period. Also William Hague took questions as the Leader of the House on more than one occasion when Cameron and Clegg were absent or unavailable. It doesn't seem like unusual practice to me. It seems more like regular practice in the absence of the Prime Minister. 98.10.179.163 (talk) 22:01, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree.

Harriet Harman was Deputy Labour Leader from 2007-10, and William Hague was First Secretary of State and de facto Conservative deputy leader. — Preceding unsigned comment added by J1995421 (talk • contribs) 03:00, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It generally has little directly to do with a politician's post in a party, though that can influence the position they get in government. The general rule of thumb is that the order for standing in at PMQs is the Deputy Prime Minister, then the First Secretary of State (if an MP) then the Leader of the House of Commons. Any two of the three posts have been held simultaneously by the same person and both DPM and FSoS have had periods of not being used plus there was a time when the FSoS was a peer. I think the "relatively unusual" dates from a period when there was a Deputy Prime Minister and so it really was rare for the Leader of the House to do the job although it could happen - for instance there was one in late 2005 when both Blair and Prescott were away so Geoff Hoon did it. Timrollpickering 22:27, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. Community Tech bot (talk) 02:57, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

[edit]

Incumbent is not "Corncob Rees-Mogg" DeputyBeagle (talk) 00:02, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Andrea Leadsom

[edit]

Why aren't Andrea Leadsom and others Right Honourables, as Lord Presidents of the Council? Weatherford (talk) 09:48, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

They were, it just hasn't been added to the list. I did a lot of work on the list some ago and simply didn't add it (some other lists of ministerial office holders have prefixes, suffixes, and birth-death included in the column). By all means add them if you think the article would be better for it. ToastButterToast (talk) 10:05, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:24, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:07, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

1834 vacancy

[edit]

Should there not be a vacancy listed in 1834 between Viscount Althorp and Robert Peel. Althorp ceased to hold office on 14th November following the fall of the Melbourne ministry. This ministry was replaced on a temporary basis by a caretaker ministry, which did not include a Leader of the House of Commons, with the post not being filled until Peel's government was formed later in December. Dunarc (talk) 21:07, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:23, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Leader_of_the_House_of_Commons&oldid=1243827550"