Talk:Jack Daniel's

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Jack Daniel's article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

Food and drink Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Spirits Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spirits, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spirits or Distilled beverages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpiritsWikipedia:WikiProject SpiritsTemplate:WikiProject SpiritsSpirits articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Spirits WikiProject task list:

This list is transcluded from the tasks page, to edit it click here.

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Spirits:

Tagging all articles that fall under our scope with {{WikiProject Spirits}} and assessing their quality and importance to the project.

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brands High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

When Jack Daniel’s Failed to Honor a Slave, an Author Rewrote History

Green label

I think that a little research would show that the green-label version was 86 proof for a while before being watered down to 80. 2600:1004:B140:7F52:3DE2:9114:5076:DE33 (talk) 21:14, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki drinkers

Here, with true LA funky-rock. ౪ Santa ౪^99° 05:31, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It was, actually, just a very short notice of inclusion for Keith Richards, removal of which was undue. Only at this point I have something to say: of course being pictured with a bottle in your hand or on your mouth doesn't necessarily makes one "notable drinker", his/her celebrity status makes one notable drinker. As for the ref, being pic'ed could really mean, although unlikely, that Keith, in this case, just happened to like holding a bottle in his hand, and a liquid in his mouth, throat and stomach, however article says explicitly "his favorite spirit" which, as a source, is due enough and clear enough, unless someone thinks we need stronger source, like, i don't know, a scholarly research, published journal paper? Twitter is just fun illustration, one article with explicit claim and lot of funn photos is quite enough - I believe we really do not need to overkill with refs on this one.--౪ Santa ౪^99° 20:13, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

But in case someone thinks some sort of at least journo research on the case, you can use this one whisky-s-place-in-rock-n-roll-history, with some other famous names included. ౪ Santa ౪^99° 20:23, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand what you are proposing to do to the article.לילך5 (talk) 20:27, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

He's trying to justify his edit warring. I would be willing to discuss adding the Keith Richards photo, but there's no point since Santasa99 has already decided we're going to include it. GA-RT-22 (talk) 23:02, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What photo; and yes consensus is a must and editor should seek it, unless one is about to add something really not controversial at all, well refed, all the while added bit is deemed, using common sense, informative and an improvement. ౪ Santa ౪^99° 23:25, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, I reverted undue removal, so, there is no justification of "edit-waring".--౪ Santa ౪^99° 23:29, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]