Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quiz system election method
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Joyous 18:37, Jan 22, 2005 (UTC)
Original research DCEdwards1966 04:30, Jan 7, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete RoySmith 04:46, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete original research. Gazpacho 09:13, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Modified article. I have cleaned it up, rendered a more neutral point of view, and ameliorated the copyright infringement problems. Please re-vote. This is still arguably hardly a noteworthy topic though, given the vague and unfinished nature of the proposal, and its lack of adherents. Abstain. Uncle G 16:13, 2005 Jan 7 (UTC)
- Interesting concept. Can't say I've heard of it, and it gets 14 google hits, most unrelated. Doesn't seem notable, but please keep contributing. A respectful delete. Meelar (talk) 18:10, Jan 7, 2005 (UTC)
- <snicker>Does anybody in their right mind really think this would fly?</snicker>Delete. Original research. RickK 22:33, Jan 7, 2005 (UTC)
- As I was doing the cleanup, I was quite tempted to add a section with all of the questions that immediately came to mind about items that were glossed over or simply wholly absent from the proposal. I didn't, of course, because that would be secondary source material. The article as it stands now isn't original research, however. It's not the proposal, nor is it an analysis of the proposal. It is a description of the proposal, as published elsewhere. What the article as it stands now is, and what you should be judging it on is, is unimportant. It only has potential interest to a handful of people. (Were the proposal actually put forward as a constitutional amendment, or even widely discussed in the political arena, this would be different.) Uncle G 23:06, 2005 Jan 7 (UTC)
- Delete, original research. Megan1967 01:40, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, original research, or if it isn't, no important politician, group, journalist, political theorist, etc has actually proposed this. --BM 12:24, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.