Talk:Democracy in America

Philosophy: Literature / Social and political / Modern Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophical literature
	Social and political philosophy
	Modern philosophy

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Longer on evaluation than facts

This feels like a class paper, longer on evaluation than facts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vicki Rosenzweig (talk • contribs) 14:29, 22 March 2003 (UTC)[reply]

In fact probably from http://usinfo.state.gov/usa/infousa/facts/democrac/13.htm .

Charles Matthews 14:35, 14 Apr 2004 (UTC)

I've rewritten the article almost entirely. It should be better now. —Lowellian (talk)[[]] 06:38, Nov 29, 2004 (UTC)

How about...?

How about combining this article and Tocqueville -article? The Tocqueville article itself is quite short now, so combining these two we would get one long article instead of two short. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.214.200.89 (talk) 08:07 (UTC)

Synergy with Tocqueville Page

The ideas and concepts shared on the Democracy in America page seem to be different from those shared in the Democracy in America section of the Tocqueville page. This should be rectified so Wikipedia is providing a consistent account.

Ethan Stone 10:43, 15 Oct 2006 (UTC)

political society

helping hands needed! AfD was put on political society article. The idea seems to be invented by Tocqueville. He pay great importance to it in Democracy in America, as well as to 'political association' concept (there is different chapter on it). --discourseur 10:17, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Alexis de Tocqueville?

Although this and the account of Democracy in America on the Alexis de Tocqueville page differ, they both represent alternative legitimate analyses. Maybe this page should be subsumed into the Alexis de Tocqueville page with both versions contrasted. 212.159.59.5 (talk) 15:05, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree. Tocqueville's life had importance in France beyond his authorship of Democracy in America. Recent biography would be great source material for the Toqueville article. A.T.S. in Texas (talk) 15:50, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bernard Henri Levy -American vertigo

Having just broached this on the talk page for de Tocqueville's article, this topic I feel needs addressing here as well. This comparatively recent work was formulated as a pretty much direct comparison to De Tocqueville's DiA, Levy visits the penitentiaries in the same manner, and explicitly addresses the comparisons between DiA and his own work. Whilst many of the conclusions that he, and us as readers, draw may be POV, it would be an error not to include some synopsis and details of this work. Thoughts? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cvmuk (talk • contribs) 11:15, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Literal" Title

A better (but slightly less literal) translation of the "literal" title would be "On Democracy in America"; in English, we usually use the preposition "on" (not "of") in titles where a subject is being treated. The Jade Knight (talk) 17:43, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have now done this ("On…" is actually the literal translation, since the "De…" in French follows Latin usage, where it means "regarding, on, about, concerning"). Vbsaliensis (talk) 10:43, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Page Development

Considering the importance of this book, we should explain some of the major themes. For example, we can discuss the Puritans, township democracy, his opinion of the federal constitution, tyranny of the majority over thought, etc. This would take a bit of work, but the page could benefit from a discussion on Tocqueville's main points. Otherwise, we should just combine this page with the one on Tocqueville himself. Churchillreader (talk) 08:25, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

So Many Edits, Leaving in the Pokemon

Why has no one fixed the reference to Tocqueville "returning to Pallet Town" with Brock and Misty? I don't edit pages because wikieditors are crazy and undo anything they didn't do themselves. So whoever thinks they own this article get the Pokemon references outta here! Promontoriumispromontorium (talk) 19:37, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tocqueville wasn't wrong

Contarry to what is written in the article, Tocqueville wasn't wrong predicting that great thinkers would be less numerous in a democracy. Please compare the population of the US with the one you had in Europe when it wasn't democratic, and the difference between capacity to produce excllent thinker. No doubt that Tocqueville was right.
By the way, he didn't say that the US wouldn't produce ANY thinker or author, so providing examples of authors (which are good, but most of them are way less impressive than top european authors before democracy) does not refute hime.
Tocqueville was wrong in some predictions, but this one is correct. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ibanche (talk • contribs) 17:15, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Democracy in America. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:05, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 5 October 2021 and 13 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Sbonesan, YL0726. Peer reviewers: AVIDBick, Jobananas.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:16, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]