User talk:Hanpuk
Leave messages here
Please take a moment to express your thoughts on this page, if you have the time. 172 00:35, 27 Mar 2004 (UTC)
The rule is: "at least two people need to state and prove that they tried to settle a dispute with this user and have failed." You have provided evidence to that effect; Hector hasn't. —No-One Jones 15:57, 19 Apr 2004 (UTC)
You requested that I look over Khmer Rouge. I don't know why you picked me. I know very little about the subject. I find the page is not very useful in learning about the party, but instead reads more like "why you should hate them too". However, Wikipedia is rife with examples of these and I would rather put my effort on working on things that I know something about. Perhaps this will pique my interest and I will research them, but not right now. Peace, DanKeshet 01:07, May 6, 2004 (UTC)
Just out of curiosity, are you using Lancemurdoch, JohnWoolsey, HectorRodriguez, Richardchilton, Venceremos, and Hanpuk all as your user names? Stargoat 16:01, 6 May 2004 (UTC)
Re: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Augusto_Pinochet#CIA_poll
FYI, User:VeryVerily is now claiming that you had no role in editing or contributing to the page, visibly no understanding of the issues, and were voting ideologically [1].
So, I guess that renders your comments irrelevant- or maybe not. 172 09:34, 18 May 2004 (UTC)
Khmer Rouge Problem
I've tried to start some kind of structured conflict resolution here: [2]
If you could state your arguments under the appropriate header, it would help the move to some kind of meaningful mediation. GuloGuloGulo 19:07, Oct 7, 2004 (UTC)