User talk:Behnam/Archive/2009

Two Articles in need of your attention

There are two entries at Wikipedia, which have falsely created by Pan-Turkists-- they are Turco-Persian and Turko-Persian Tradition. Both entries are factitious. I have requested the entries to be deleted. My reasons are:

The term Turko-Persian Tradition (or Turco-Persian) does not exists academically and it is a factitious entry! Check the Encyclopaedia Iranica to confirm -- The correct name for that culture is the Persianate culture not the "Turko-Persian". Turkophones (mostly of mixed race and Persianized in culture) only spoke in Turkic dialects and were in the military. That is not enough participation in creating and forming the culture to deserve the name "Turko-Persian Tradition" – This is misinformation. All the elements in that area, which have to do with tradition and culture, were drawn from the Iranian culture (Persian, Kurdish, Azari, Baluchi, Tajik, Luri, Gilaki, Talishi, Mazandarani, etc.), and the Islamic faith, not much Turkic elements (like shamanism, yurts etc.) were incorporated in. That is what makes the name "Turko-Persian" an imaginary one and therefore the entry should be deleted.

Any contributions would greatly appreciate – please add your comments, whether you agree with the deletion, or otherwise to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Turco-Persian as well as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Turko-Persian Tradition. Bā Sepās Surena 03:03, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Persian Atlas created

Behnam... please check the following maps gallery and tell me where you need them in the Afghanistan Project, or a persian project if needed... and yes i will update the map to include these two great cities...

but ill do it first thing in the morning, im really tired of drawing maps for the Persian Dynasties for over 10 Hours...

perhaps some sleep then back to the wikiworld..

Peace be with you...

Map Gallery:

User:Arab League/Maps

please check the Persian section thank you

Fair use rationale for Image:GUADEC Logo.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:GUADEC Logo.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. PxMa 19:45, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Irnic-logo.01.96p.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Irnic-logo.01.96p.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:28, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:IRNIC Logo.png

Thanks for uploading Image:IRNIC Logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:39, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - a stub template or category which you created has been nominated for deletion or renaming at Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion. The stub type, which was not proposed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals, does not meet the standard requirements for a stub type, either through being incorrectly named, ambiguously scoped, or through failure to meet standards relating to the current stub hierarchy or likely size, as explained at Wikipedia:Stub. Please feel free to make any comments at WP:SFD regarding this stub type, and in future, please consider proposing new stub types first! Grutness...wha? 00:01, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Office season episodes

Hi. You might want to add the numbering in a new column or change the key to the lists; the edits have caused an inconsistency with "Series #" and its representation in the small key above the tables. Doesn't really matter which you do, either will suffice. Mastrchf (^t/_c) 00:16, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. The small keys to the lists (they're in prose form, but I would call it a key) are just above each of the tables, and basically start with something along the lines of "Series # refers to the episode number in relation to the entire series". Because that's no longer completely true, that line needs to be either revised or the table should have another column added to reflect the difference between Series Number and Season Number. Mastrchf (^t/_c) 00:31, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]