Conventicle Act 1664
| Act of Parliament | |
 | |
| Long title | An Act to prevent and suppresse seditious Conventicles. |
|---|---|
| Citation | 16 Cha. 2. c. 4 |
| Dates | |
| Royal assent | 17 May 1664 |
| Commencement | 16 March 1664 |
| Expired | 19 December 1667 |
| Repealed | 28 July 1863 |
| Other legislation | |
| Repealed by | Statute Law Revision Act 1863 |
Status: Repealed | |
| Text of statute as originally enacted | |
The Conventicle Act 1664 was an Act of the Parliament of England (16 Cha. 2. c. 4[2]) that forbade conventicles, defined as religious assemblies of more than five people other than an immediate family, outside the auspices of the Church of England and the rubrics of the 1662 Book of Common Prayer.[3][4]
This law was a part of the Clarendon Code, named after Edward Hyde, 1st Earl of Clarendon, which aimed to discourage nonconformism and to strengthen the position of the Established Church but the Clarendon Code was not actually the work of Clarendon himself, who favoured a policy of greater tolerance towards dissenters.[5] These prohibitions led many, such as the Covenanters, to vacate their parishes rather than submit to the new Episcopal authorities. Just as the ministers left so too did the congregations, following their old pastors to sermons on the hillside. From small beginnings these field assemblies—or conventicles—were to grow into major problems of public order for the government.[citation needed]
The operation of the Clarendon Code at least as far as Protestants were concerned was mitigated somewhat by Charles II's Royal Declaration of Indulgence in 1672, which suspended the execution of the Penal Laws and allowed a certain number of non-conformist chapels to be staffed and constructed, with the pastors subject to royal approval.
The Conventicle Act was formally repealed in 1689,[citation needed] although its authority had lapsed, by default, in 1667.
Provisions
[edit]Firstly, the Act confirmed that the Religion Act 1592 was still in force.
Secondly, it declared that if any person aged sixteen or over after the 1 July 1664 is present at any religious meeting other than of the Church of England where there are five persons or more assembled together (other than those of the same household), then they would be tried by two justices of the peace or one chief magistrate, without a jury.
If found guilty, the penalties were as follows:
- first offence: imprisonment for up to three months without bail, or a five pounds fine (to be paid to the poor of the convicted person's parish).
- second offence: imprisonment for up to six months without bail, or a ten pounds fine (to be disposed of as above).
- third offence: transportation for seven years, or a one hundred pounds fine.
Subsequent sections of the Act allowed for the breaking up of such meetings, if a warrant had been issued, and the arresting of the convenor of the meeting, and the owner of the venue, who were subject to the same penalties as above, if found guilty. There were penalties for officials not carrying out court orders. The prosecution had to occur within three months of the act, and no other prosecution could be brought for the offence. A special clause applied to Quakers who refused to swear an oath in court without due reason. They were immediately declared guilty and sentenced to transportation. Minor variations in procedure and penalties were also made for peers of the realm. The Act was to remain in force for three years.[6]
Jewish reaction
[edit]Although aimed at Nonconformists, when the Conventicle Act was passed, the Jews, led by their new rabbi Jacob Sasportas, took their anxieties to Charles II, who told them, "laughing and spitting", not to worry; later the Privy Council put it in writing that Jews could "promise themselves the effects of the same favour as formerly they have had, so long as they demean themselves peaceably and quietly, with due obedience to His Majesty's laws and without scandal to his government". Thus the English Jews, by an act of omission, as it were, became subjects, under no more disabilities than those inherent in their own unwillingness, like Catholics and Nonconformists, to belong to the Church of England or, in their particular case, to swear Christian oaths.[7]
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ Lawson, Rev. R. (1885). Maybole Past and Present. Pub. J. & R. Parlane. p. 49.
- ^ This nomenclature is a reference to the statute book of the numbered year of the reign of the named King in the stated chapter. This is the method used for Acts of Parliament from before 1962. Although Charles II did not assume the throne until 1660, all legal documents were dated as if he had succeeded his father, Charles I, as king in 1649.
- ^ Lodge, Richard (1923). The History of England From the Restoration to the Death of William III (1660–1702). p. 69. OCLC 740976301.
- ^ Chadwick, W. Owen. "Protestantism: The Restoration (1660-85)". Britannica. Retrieved 22 June 2022.
- ^ History Learning Site – Clarendon Code
- ^ "Charles II, 1664: An Act to prevent and suppresse seditious Conventicles. | British History Online". www.british-history.ac.uk. Retrieved 17 April 2022.
- ^ Paul Johnson, A History of the Jews, p. 278
- "Charles II, 1664: An Act to prevent and suppresse seditious Conventicles", The Statutes of the Realm: volume 5: 1628–80 (1819), pp. 516–20. Date accessed: 5 March 2007.
- Acts of the Parliament of England concerning religion
- Acts of the Parliament of England
- 1664 in law
- English Reformation
- Persecution of Protestants
- Persecution of the Covenanters
- Christianity and law in the 17th century
- 1664 in England
- 1664 in Christianity
- 17th-century Judaism
- Religious persecution
- Jewish English history