User talk:IsarSteve

; Archives
	2004; 2005; 2006;

Welcome! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date.

Please leave a new message.

London Buses route 42

I've completed the route History etc. for the 42, but I've no idea where you get the bus stop information from, timings etc., can you help? Also I'd like now to write the 55, 48 & 56 (all not that complicated).. or the 41(more complicated) ..could you give me some subpages?

Since I wrote the above, I noticed you've written that the articles are not all standard and are sometimes not well written. Do you want me to continue??..If not I'll stop.. --IsarSteve 20:29, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

There are currently two AfDs active on bus articles, so if you could hold off creating new ons for the time being, that wourd be great. It would be really halpful if you could add to the current ones, though. A list of ones requiring attetion is available here--sonicKAI 15:21, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:LT

Welcome!

Hi, and welcome to the London Transport WikiProject! We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of London's transport system.

A few features that you might find helpful:

You may want to join or create a task force which attempts to drive the improvement of articles within a smaller scope.
The project also provides templates to help you make the perfect article.

There are a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:

Starting some new articles? Our article structure tips outlines some things to include.
Want to know how good our articles are? The assessment department is working on rating the quality of every London transport article in Wikipedia.
You can vote for the London Transport portal's selected article and selected image of the month here.
Submit your interesting London Transport facts at Portal:London Transport/Did you know for our portal.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask another fellow member, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around!

— From the members of WikiProject London Transport

08:56, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:AppleMural.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:AppleMural.JPG. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then you need to specify who owns the copyright, please. If you got it from a website, then a link to the website where it was taken from with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:08, 12 January 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MECU≈talk 00:08, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Timtable links

The timetable links don't always seem to work.. e.g.

--IsarSteve 01:41, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. A few of them have different names --sonicKAI 01:46, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The London Buses route 5 timetable link is still a bit wobbly :o) --IsarSteve 22:24, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've checked it myself. They work perfectly. --sonicKAI 01:50, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links auf German car number plates

Hallo IsarSteve, in letzter Zeit gibt es wieder Probleme mit einer kommerziellen Internetseite, die ihren Link dort hinterlässt. Ich habe mal den Abschnitt "External links" aufgeräumt und Einträge von nicht mehr aufrufbare Seiten gelöscht und die Zulassungslisten durch die deutschen Wikipedia-Pendants ersetzt. Es gibt für mich keinen Grund mehr, warum "germanplate.net" und Co sich unter den "Ext. links" verewigen müssen. Auf der Diskussionseite scheinen die auch nicht den Sinn der Links zu verstehen. Wie denkst du von den Ereignissen der letzten Tage? Könntest du ebenso einen Blick auf den Artikel German car number plates haben (->Beobachtungsliste)? Ich komme mir etwas "verlassen" vor. Danke und Grüße -Toshi 19:51, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Back to the grind...

Glad to see you're still here. Have returned to Northeast London duties. Hope to review the Tottenham articles soon... Tarquin Binary 01:01, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Buses at Work images

It seems that they might be revoking their consent the same way Adam Murray did. Don't upload any more from their site until further notice. --sonicKAI 11:40, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I had noticed that something was up, but fortunately I haven't uploaded an of their images--IsarSteve 16:52, 22 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

London bus page in Excile

Well, this link: http://isarsteve.de/blog/uploads/MBLN021729.jpg (the first one) definatley looks more like a dot matrix. It’s more like a traditional blind then and LEDs. But I 'spose you took the photo!! -- Arriva ⁴³⁶

Bus pictures

No more pictures can be used from www.busesatwork.co.uk--sonicKAI 22:08, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:StAnnsChurch.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:StAnnsChurch.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. And no, your user page does not count as an article! You're not allowed to put fair-use images on user pages anyway. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —An gr 18:01, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Black Boy Lane

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Black Boy Lane, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Regan123 12:55, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Victoria line article

Thanks for your comments IsarSteve on Victoria line. If all the facts can be verified in the book you mention then can you reference the book with all the relevant details in the article. Statements on Wikipedia need to be verifiable (WP:CITE). Personally (and I'd be interested in your comments here) I don't think simply mentioning the book you named in "Further Reading" (it's not currently) would count as citing sources, as someone reading the article wouldn't know which claims were verified by the book. Tompagenet 06:56, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Manor House

Hi ya I note that you've changed the text of the Manor House article from indicating that it straddles the border of Haringey and Hackney to being solely in Hackney. The article states that the area is centred on the tube station - which (I believe has one exit in the LBH, but no part of the tube station). Of the area surrounding the crossroads, I believe 3/4 lies in Haringey, and 1/4 within LBH. I note the tube station has also mysteriously moved to Hackney - despite Hackney being able to proudly boast that it is the one borough north of the river not to have a tube station.

The stuff I added relied on the information that was already there, and I didn't change any of it - apart from changing Hackney -> Neighbourhood of Hackney and Haringey -> Neighbourhood of Haringey; and adding the two borough nav bars.

I know the border goes through there, and the junctions are quite complex (in fact, it's probably more true to say that Manor House is covered by tarmac!), but I think between us, we can work out what's going on geographically.

Cheers Kbthompson 23:31, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message.

As far as I can make out, the Haringey -> Hackney border follows the Finsbury Park Border along the north side of Seven Sisters Road to the Manor House Junction. It then proceeds along the west side of Green Lanes to a point just past the Hermitage Road junction where Green Lanes "submerges" totally into Haringey. This would mean that the situation is actully the reverse of what you state (3/4 lies in Hackney, and 1/4 within LBHgy, with only one entrance of the Underground Station falling into Haringey "territory". --IsarSteve 08:10, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can we agree for my immediate purposes that Manor House should be both a Neighbourhood of Haringey and Hackney; and I'll add both boro' nav-bars?

Looking at a ward map of Hackney (Haringey's website appears to be down); I thought the boundary was Green Lanes, it's actually 7SR (I forgot Brownswood). The boundary is the bottom of the steep hill following Eade Road. The park and all but one exit of the tube lie in Haringey though ... I might have a go at the text - please correct me if I go wrong. Kbthompson 09:58, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, to shed some light on the discussion which ward for Manor House, this map shows you the Hackney side [1]. The east side is under New River ward, the south side is under Brownswood ward, the north/west side is under Harringay (Haringey borough). --Finsburypark 09:30, 12 August 2007 (GMT)

Hey, Thanks for the map.. it's very interesting and helpful to me in Family History matters.. one thing that I noticed is how oddly shaped the LB Hackney actually is... not at all "rounded".. It doesn't really look like an "Einheit"...--IsarSteve 13:26, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Route 44

I wouldn't add this quite yet. There are still some basics that need completing like the route and the infobox. Simply south 23:01, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK but I just wanted to notify that I had started working on It--IsarSteve 23:03, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:My Hong Kong.jpg

Hello, IsarSteve. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:My Hong Kong.jpg) was found at the following location: User:IsarSteve. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 07:00, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:London-2012-logo.svg

Hello, IsarSteve. An automated process has found and will an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that is in your userspace. The image (Image:London-2012-logo.svg) was found at the following location: User:IsarSteve. This image or media will be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. This does not necessarily mean that the image is being deleted, or that the image is being removed from other pages. It is only being removed from the page mentioned above. All mainspace instances of this image will not be affected Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 18:52, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Origin of Harringay Road Names

Can you help with providing the source for your addition of the Harringay site about the origin of the road names? You can post here or in the Harringay Talk site.

Montague Rd School

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Montague Rd School, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. B. Wolterding 12:53, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wot - u nevva 'eard of a houuse!!

It's a flemish house. Dincha know! PS: Will get back to you on HCmail - apols for no reply. hjuk 16:23, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oakwood tube station

A query has been raised regarding a trivia item at Oakwood tube station which states that Oakwood station is the highest on the Piccadilly Line. The original version of the statement first appeared in your edit of 2 May 2006 as:

"Oakwood Station is the highest point on the Piccadilly Line at 275 feet above sea level. When opened in 1933 a commerative bronze plate was fixed to the booking hall wall "This station is highest point in Europe in a direct line west of the Ural Mountains."

It has been correctly pointed out that Cockfosters is, in fact, at a higher elevation than Oakwood. Could you confirm what your source was and also the source of the statement regarding the bronze plate? The statement on the plate seems strange considering that the Urals extend over 2500 km north-south and pretty much everywhere in Britain is west of the Urals. Ignoring the rest of northern Europe and the Scandinavian countries, there are many places in Britain with higher elevations than Oakwood. Could you reply on the Oakwood station talkpage. Thanks, DavidCane 15:38, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

History and Picture of LS230

Leyland National LS230 on the stand at Stroud Green (The Stapleton), before working the last ever journey from this point. September 1982.

Dear IsarSteve

Do you know where the origianl image came from. I know who is now the owner of LS230 and they are trying to track down any original pictures.

I am the owner of the picture and I was the driver on the day the picture was taken. I probably have some more of LS230 too! I would also be interested in contact with the owner. Can you put us in touch?--IsarSteve 12:39, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dear IsarSteve

A primary school now owns the bus now.

Regards - A parent —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.146.246.199 (talk) 14:28, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you like, you could leave a comment with your email address on "My blog" site: IsarSteve's Blogsite.

I will delete the address from the Blog as soon as I've noted it.. --IsarSteve 00:56, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

LS230 contact

Dear IsarSteve

We have located LS230 at the edge of our playground and plan to use it as an outside classroom.

It will be great if you were to write us a letter about driving LS230 and that last day. Do you have any pictures of you and your other staff typically standing next to a bus or the bus station. This helps the children understand the age of the bus and it's history.

We will contact you soon - thanks for your help.

Regards Head Teacher —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.43.162.24 (talk) 10:33, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've read your message, I don't have much time now but I'll be in touch later.--IsarSteve 14:34, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Germany Invitation

Hello, IsarSteve! I'd like to call your attention to the WikiProject Germany and the German-speaking Wikipedians' notice board. I hope their links, sub-projects and discussions are interesting and even helpful to you. If not, I hope that new ones will be.

--Zeitgespenst (talk) 17:08, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

tx for typo corr on HS hjuk (talk) 14:20, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of cemeteries

Hi IsarSteve. In view of your efforts to maintain List of cemeteries, I did a search sort for cemetery articles not listed in List of cemeteries. I posted the results at User:Bebestbe/New cemeteries. Please feel free to add the cemeteries listed User:Bebestbe/New cemeteries to List of cemeteries. -- Bebestbe (talk) 04:34, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: Image:Hilde02.jpg

Image:Hilde02.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:Image:HildeHildebrand-Heerstrasse.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[Image:HildeHildebrand-Heerstrasse.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 14:57, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Grethe.jpg is now available as Commons:Image:Grethe Weiser-Schwerin.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 15:07, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

London Buses route 93

After doing some tidying of the very detailed history section, I have just placed a tag on this article requesting that the sources be cited. You appear to have been the author of most of the section back in January 2007, could you add references to your sources please. --DavidCane (talk) 14:47, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of London Buses route 42

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is London Buses route 42. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/London Buses route 42. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:07, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of London Buses route 66

London Buses route 66, an article you contributed to, is now up for deletion, you are welcome to comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/London Buses route 77. Okip 15:21, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

also London_Buses_route_75 Okip 23:32, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Tottenham1934.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Tottenham1934.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:42, 28 August 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:42, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:City Route536.JPG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:45, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:City Route536.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:City Route536.JPG.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the image description page states the source and copyright status of the derivative work, it only names the creator of the original work without specifying the status of their copyright over the work.

Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the original image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. Thanks again for your cooperation. Kelly ^hi! 02:34, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:49, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, IsarSteve. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, IsarSteve. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, IsarSteve. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, IsarSteve. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:17, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"London Buses route 48" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect London Buses route 48. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 29#London Buses route 48 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Pkbwcgs (talk) 20:42, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I thought the "London Buses route 48" was long gone. (IsarSteve (talk) 21:38, 29 March 2021 (UTC))[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]