Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brigsoft
Brigsoft was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was a consensus to delete the article.
This company makes Alarm Master Plus, and is otherwise entirely unnotable. We're not a catalog of companies. JFW | T@lk 16:14, 11 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete JFW | T@lk 16:14, 11 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Repeated instance of spam, non-notable. –Andre (talk) 16:15, Oct 11, 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. —No-One Jones (m) 16:15, 11 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Not a corporate index. Not notable. --Improv 17:54, 11 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Not important, only spam. Same applies to the obscure products of this company. andy 19:41, 11 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Not a notable company. Seems to be here for advertising. MarkS 20:10, 11 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Spam, along with the pages of their obscure products that are created repeatedly these days (e.g. Spam Trapper for Outlook and the like). - Strangeloop (talk) 22:13, 11 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete all as spam, speedy if possible. Isn't "Alarm Master Plus" protected from editing because of this continuing idiocy? - Lucky 6.9 23:05, 11 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete, spam, and the spammer has three times reverted my deactivation of the external link in the article. —Stormie 06:03, Oct 12, 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Wikispam. Speedy delete Alarm Master and Alarm Master Plus after few days of protection. jni 08:40, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Not a notable company. Gamaliel 05:55, 13 Oct 2004 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.