Talk:Factor analysis
Appearance
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Archives (Index) |
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
Bass-Ackwards analysis
[edit]There is a form of factor analysis that has not been mentioned in this article which is useful.
- https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0092656606000134
- https://experts.umn.edu/en/publications/a-general-method-for-computing-hierarchical-component-structures-
- https://www.infona.pl/resource/bwmeta1.element.elsevier-101f4492-b753-35d3-898f-f6efcda2d8f3
- Possible Utility https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5216419/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.136.243.17 (talk) 11:06, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Independence v.s. Orthogonality
[edit]In section "Mathematical model of the same example" the text says:
The errors are assumed to be independent of the factors:
I don't understand how this is an assumption. The equation seems as if factors and errors were orthogonal by construction. As an assumption I would have expected an expected value on the left hand side. Matze-pigon (talk) 18:39, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class WikiProject Business articles
- Mid-importance WikiProject Business articles
- WikiProject Business articles
- C-Class Marketing & Advertising articles
- Mid-importance Marketing & Advertising articles
- WikiProject Marketing & Advertising articles
- C-Class psychology articles
- Mid-importance psychology articles
- WikiProject Psychology articles
- C-Class Statistics articles
- High-importance Statistics articles
- WikiProject Statistics articles