Talk:Dumfries and Galloway (UK Parliament constituency)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject UK Parliament constituencies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of UK Parliament constituencies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UK Parliament constituenciesWikipedia:WikiProject UK Parliament constituenciesTemplate:WikiProject UK Parliament constituenciesUK Parliament constituencies articles

Politics of the United Kingdom Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Elections and Referendums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

William or McNabb?

I have seen this being edited several times. I feel that it should be William that is listed on Wikipedia instead of McNabb because this is what the statement of persons nominated defines. Whereas others have edited it to read McNabb as this is what the candidate goes by. What are peoples thoughts - Going by what the statement of persons nominated defines or what the candidate themselves goes by? OrkneyLad1996 (talk) 11:25, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I think common names probably beat 'official' names in this cases. As noted in the edit history, his campaign website [[1]] uses McNabb, as does the BBC candidate page [[2]]. I see your point about having a uniform rule, but whether this relates to the SOPN or a reliable news source should be decided. PinkPanda272 (talk) 20:13, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for starting this thread. I've not seen any paper election material, but his online presence encourages people to "Vote McNabb" (see links here: [[3]]). He is going by one of the first names listed on the statement of persons nominated, just not the very first one. People use Wikipedia as a source. I think it would be confusing to list one candidate by a different name to what they're campaigning with. The only way round it would be to list each candidate by their full name, but I don't think that's necessary. C1614 (talk) 20:21, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"A very slim Labour majority"

In the section talking about the new seat having "a very slim Labour majority" due to boundary changes, would it not be better to say "notionally have a very slim Labour majority" as predicting what results on new boundaries is not an exact science and such examples are usually called "notional" majorities. Dunarc (talk) 20:34, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]