Talk:Egg-and-spoon race
A fact from Egg-and-spoon race appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 23 July 2012 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Egg-and-spoon race. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Egg-and-spoon race at the Reference desk. |
Untitled
[edit]We always used boiled eggs to save on mess! Rich Farmbrough 21:21, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- We always used large potatoes -- it is cheaper for the organisers, it is less of a mess, and the whobbly shaped objects make the race more fun. -- leuce (talk) 07:38, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
Since when was eating the egg part of the Egg and Spoon race? Synthetic eggs to prevent salmonella would only make sense if the eggs were eaten, and how do you eat an synthetic egg, unless it's chocolate or something... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.202.156.84 (talk • contribs) 22:45, 1 July 2005
- Seconded. We sometimes used boiled eggs and sometimes raw, but nobody ever thought of eating them. PeteVerdon 15:22, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
- I think the salmonella issue is when you bring your own egg and take it back home again, thinking that it isn't broken when in fact the shell was cracked. -- leuce (talk) 07:38, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
- At my primary school, we used an artificial solid 'egg' - I'm not sure what it was made of but it didn't seem edible. But at some point I read a story of a school sports day and the egg and spoon race therein. From what I remember, the participants brought their own eggs, and the expectation was that they would bring hard-boiled ones, but this one boy (who might have been the central character) had a raw egg and it fell and broke. Unless the risk of breaking the egg and being out of the race is part of the game, this is an obvious reason not to use raw eggs.
- But there must be somebody out there who runs egg and spoon races with real eggs (raw, boiled or otherwise) and can tell us what gets done with the eggs afterwards. I can see a few possibilities:
- The participants get to eat them on site afterwards
- The participants get to take their eggs home
- The host keeps them and later uses them for meals
- The host keeps them for re-use in future egg and spoon races (for how long after the use-by date would they still work for this?)
- They just get thrown away (which I would hope doesn't happen)
- — Smjg (talk) 01:13, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Egg-and-spoon race. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.wshc.eu/blog/why-are-wiltshires-towns-villages-and-schools-looking-back-to-look-forward-to-the-queens-jubilee.html - Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.britishcouncil.org/english_days_with_the_british_council.doc - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140429045339/http://media.stars.manchester.ac.uk/files/sport/Sports_tournament.pdf to http://media.stars.manchester.ac.uk/files/sport/Sports_tournament.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:21, 21 December 2016 (UTC)