Talk:Body fluids in art

Untitled

I remember a canadian artist who got people to pee in the snow & then made plaster casts of the holes or something. maybe worht a mention if someone knows of -- Tarquin

She wasn't Canadian, it turns out, but English (she did the business in Canada though). --Camembert

Marc Quinn's sculpture is now destroyed with the unplugging of Saatchi's freezer; we should mention this if anyone can get me a year on it. --Daniel C. Boyer

It isn't actually - that was a scurrilous rumour. See the Marc Quinn article for details. --Camembert

There are many blood artists today; however, many of them do not consider their art "contemporary" which technically means art after WWII. I believe the definition and presentation of contemporary art by galleries and museums likens more to pop art. --Mativity —Preceding undated comment added 03:57, 4 August 2011 (UTC).[reply]

No Artist Spam Please

note to living artists and their girlfriends/boyfriends: no promotional artist-spam here please. contemporary artists with a track record of legitimate non-vanity gallery exhibits at major venues in major cities or at least artists with mentions in major media outlets might be worthy. if you just graduated as an art major and included pee in something hanging in your mom's living room, please don't clutter the article with promotions of your website. come back when you're notable. thank you Cramyourspam (talk) 17:29, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Body fluids in art. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110204204738/http://www.wired.com:80/underwire/tag/jordan-eagles/ to http://www.wired.com/underwire/tag/jordan-eagles/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:29, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Body fluids in art. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:33, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

why have semen if there are no entries for it

just sayin' — Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.167.69.13 (talk) 18:53, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Marcel Duchamp's "Paysage Fautif" was actually made from the artist's semen, according to this article: https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2014/apr/07/marcel-duchamp-artist-a-z-dictionary. I don't know how to edit the scheme, though. It would be great if someone could fix this. Kind regards ThomasBJ (talk) 09:57, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Body fluids in art. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:27, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Title versus content

Sorry to bring this up, but faeces aren't really a body fluid unless they're in the form of diarrhoea. I think the title needs changing to reflect this. (The only alternatives I can think of at present are body products and bodily substances, but I think a better term probably exists.) Musiconeologist (talk) 18:42, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]