Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Courtney Jill Kobylanski
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. I've done so. Mgm|(talk) 13:37, Feb 9, 2005 (UTC)
Vanity. 'Delete.-gadfium 05:39, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Vanity. Gtabary 16:09, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, not notable, vanity. Megan1967 01:59, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, the epitome of a vanity article. 23skidoo 05:05, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete vanity. Bearcat 18:30, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, no encyclopedic context and none coming. Samaritan 18:36, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete --Spinboy 00:07, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, but I'd sure like to get to know her. Riffsyphon1024 20:33, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Keep None of you even took the time to google her? I'm voting to keep. -GregNorc (talk) 01:15, Feb 1, 2005 (UTC)
- I did google her. I searched on "Courtney Jill Kobylanski", "Courtney Kobylanski" and "Jill Kobylanski", and got exactly two results each time: the very page under debate, and VfD itself. What's your basis for claiming that she's notable enough to keep, exactly? Bearcat 03:10, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Lemme guess-- girlfriendcruft? Delete. Edeans 07:23, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Delete I was also able to find this link about her. - James Teterenko (talk) 05:36, 2 Feb 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.