Talk:General Grant (tree)

Plants Low‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

California Stub‑class Mid‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Vicki --- In the web page [1], notice the difference between Giant Forest and Grant Grove.. General Grant is the largest in Grant Grove, 3rd largest overall (in the Park, and in the World). May I revert the edit? -- hike395

Second tallest tree

How is this the second tallest tree? There are loads of trees over a 100 m. See Stratosphere Giant and the links from it. Piet 13:45, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ahh, largest in mass. You could clarify that. Piet 13:51, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Statistics in article are suspect

The statistics quoted in the article are either uncited, or cite to a web article about the General Sherman tree. We need to verify the statistics for this tree with a reliable source. hike395 (talk) 03:52, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[2] lists the tree's height to be 81.7 meters as of 2002. Has the tree grown 3 meters in the last 6 years? If so, what is the source? Thanks! hike395 (talk) 03:55, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bradluke22 adds exaggerated numbers everywhere in Wikipedia, especially regarding Sequoiadendron and other large tree species of western North America.Krasanen (talk) 12:35, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The cited source is out-of-print, and unavailable from books.google.com ... I've ordered it from interlibrary loan. Until I (or some other third Wikipedian) can verify the statistics, I've removed them from the article. hike395 (talk) 16:39, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on General Grant (tree). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070328195728/http://www.sequoia.national-park.com:80/info.htm#bea to http://www.sequoia.national-park.com/info.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:43, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on General Grant (tree). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050828043733/http://www.nps.gov/seki/grantwlk/gg1.htm to http://www.nps.gov/seki/grantwlk/gg1.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:25, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Age of General Grant?

According to this article, this tree is 3000 years old, though this document mentions half of it. I won't change the article as the original information as a source, though I am not sure which one is more reliable.

109.255.36.197 (talk) 09:35, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cats

Hello @Gildir: I don't think the cats Category:Individual giant sequoia trees Category:Individual trees in California are the same. Are all of them in California? If not then we need both cats.